MOVIE TITLE: Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice
DIRECTOR: Zack Snyder
YEAR: 2016
GENRE: Superhero
RATING: PG-13 for violence and language
GRADE: Mixed
In the public eye, Superman is either seen as a godlike
savior for the neighboring cities of Metropolis and Gotham
or a reckless oaf who leaves destruction as part of his heroism. The Wayne
Enterprises building and the people inside happened to be victims of Superman’s
carelessness and now Batman wants revenge for the fallen. Stirring the pot
between these superheroes is Lex Luthor, a corporate prodigy who comes into
possession of Kryptonite (Superman’s weakness). Can Batman and Superman get
along and team up against the real threat to humanity or will their shades of
gray characteristics blind them into fighting each other to the death?
The fact that Zack Snyder uses shades of gray logic to
define Batman and Superman is part of what makes this movie unique. Superman
can be careless when it comes to containing his powers, but Batman can be just
as sadistic and merciless when he brands the bat symbol onto criminals before
sending them to jail. These two characters cancel each other out when it comes
to the moral high ground, so much so that political pundits such as Charlie
Rose and Neil Degrasse Tyson had to be brought in to discuss their risk vs.
reward values. I’m not saying we’ll have a recklessly devastating superhero
scenario in real life, but if we did, are we as a society prepared to make
compromises and see the middle ground? We ccouldn’t find that middle ground even
without Superman and Batman killing everything, so we’re pretty much doomed.
Just look at all the buildings that get destroyed in the name of superhero
politics. People give anime a hard time for having buildings burn to the ground
so easily, but they need to see this movie for more of the same.
This fictional political climate might have been more
jarring to watch if the shooting of the movie was better executed. Something
about this movie makes me want to give it a mixed grade despite all it has
going for it. It could be the lack of character investment. It could be the
slow pacing. It could be the cliché violence and destruction. It could be that
the pieces of this plot were lazily thrown together. Maybe it’s the way the
movie dragged on for over two hours of nothingness. I can’t pinpoint one
feature of this movie that’s responsible for the negative reviews it got, but
when my brother asked me what I thought of it, all I could say was, “Meh”. The
movie had loads of potential to be something great, but something about it just
made me want to tune out.
Whatever the main negative point could have been, it
certainly wasn’t Jesse Eisenberg’s acting when it came to his portrayal of Lex
Luthor. I know he got a Golden Raspberry award for worst supporting actor, but
I disagree with that opinion. Lex’s character drew a lot of parallels to Heath
Ledger’s version of The Joker with how delightfully insane and quirky he was. I
have a soft spot for crazy-minded characters due to how relatable they are (not
in every way, but in some ways). Sometimes the villains are more relatable than
the superheroes. In fact, they can be just as “shades of gray” as Batman and
Superman are in this movie. I keep wondering what it was that made Lex Luthor
snap the way he did. We don’t get a clear answer by the end, so that makes me
even more curious. Either way, I love his kooky portrayal! The body language,
the tics, the cadence in his voice, even Lex’s hairstyle reminds me of The
Joker. Golden Raspberry, my foot!
While Batman vs. Superman isn’t a perfect movie, I’m not
going to completely dump all over it despite its glaring flaws. A mixed grade
is nothing to sneeze at, especially considering everybody else seems to be
headhunting these days when reviewing suspicious movies. I wanted to enjoy this
movie. I love the DC Universe. I stuck with the film until the end. Again, it’s
not perfect, but the haters can calm down just for a little while before they
click that one or two-star option.
No comments:
Post a Comment