Showing posts with label Debating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debating. Show all posts

Sunday, April 7, 2019

Special


VERSE 1
Everybody thinks they’re special
Thinks they’re on a godly level
Thinks that they’re the chosen one
Has an ego that weighs twelve tons
You can’t brainwash me, you bastard
You’re not my undisputed master
You have no logic of your own
You’re just another fucking clone

CHORUS
You’re not special in any damn way
Too much sameness in what you say
Too much sameness in what you do
Words hurt, especially when they’re true

VERSE 2
Intimidation tactics, steel cage matches
Try to cut me down like a war hatchet
Long-winded talking, internet stalking
Everything of mine is worth mocking
There’s just one problem with your plan
It’s been done before, you stupid man
Over and over again, it gets so old
I shrug you off with a heart so cold

CHORUS
You’re not special in any damn way
Too much sameness in what you say
Too much sameness in what you do
Words hurt, especially when they’re true

VERSE 3
I never asked to be a politician
Someone else’s cannibal nutrition
Someone else’s bitch of submission
Someone else’s act of sedition
All I wanted to do was live my life
Any way I want whether wrong or right
You think you’re coming for my crown
You’re the court jester, a fucking clown

EXTENDED CHORUS
You’re not special in any damn way
Too much sameness in what you say
Too much sameness in what you do
Words hurt, especially when they’re true
You’re not special in your diction
Everything you say is fucking fiction
Everything you do fucks up your mission
Defeat is your own damn admission

Monday, April 18, 2016

Debating

***DEBATING***

Even though I post a lot of short stories with controversial topics and post John Oliver videos on my Face Book page, I actually don’t like debating that much. I agree with the idea of being open to new ideas and not being completely coddled from the opposing side. However, if someone tries to engage me in a debate, the most talking points I’ll ever have in that conversation is…maybe two. After those talking points are on the table, I have nothing left and I’m completely vulnerable to the limitless number of talking points the other guy has. Being on this jobber losing streak in a debate has nothing to do with the fact that I’m right or wrong. It just means that I don’t have an unlimited number of talking points. I suppose I could cure that with extensive research, but that only adds maybe two or three more talking points to the already short list.

It didn’t dawn on me just how bad my debating skills were until I moved into my dorm room at Western Washington University in 2007. I had a roommate named Carl who was always helpful to me and an all around nice guy. However, when he tried to engage me in a debate, I would sit there in silence not knowing how to answer his talking points. Carl described himself as a “conservative with a strong liberal twist”, but most of his talking points were right-leaning in nature. He’d present all of these carefully-worded arguments that went on for about a minute or a minute and a half and it always drove me nuts that I couldn’t debunk all of them.

So whenever I hear somebody talk about open-mindedness, I always tell them it’s a two way street. In other words, if you want me to be open to your viewpoints, you have to be open to mine. But that’s the problem: my viewpoints only have a lifespan of one burst of alphabet soup. After that, it’s over. I’m like a bottle rocket when it comes to debating, which is why I avoid it most of the time.

Of course, there’s another reason why I avoid debates and it’s because I have this fear of offending my best friends by justifying the things they hate. It’s the reason why I don’t wave a Richard Dawkins book in the face of one of my Christian friends. Not only is it offensive to do, but it could kill the friendship. I put love and friendship before politics and religion every single time. If somebody gives me a ride when I need one or cooks me a nice meal or gives me twenty bucks to buy my favorite book, why should it matter what side of the political spectrum they’re on? Of course, I wouldn’t accept a million dollars from Donald Trump, but that’s because…well…he’s Donald Trump. But you get what I’m saying, right?

So if you see me back out of an argument, it’s not because I’m closing myself off to that person. It’s because unlike that person, I can’t keep talking forever and ever and ever. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to watch some more John Oliver videos and chase them down with a rant by Immortal Technique about vegetarianism. Peace! I’m out!


***SWAMPLANDIA***

As many of you have noticed either from my Deviant Art journals or my Good Reads account, I’ve been chipping away at “Swamplandia” by Karen Russell for a little under two months now. According to my Good Reads account, I’m 83% done with it, which means I’m going to spend one day blowing through the rest of it. Even though I’m not finished with it yet, I’ve already decided that it’s going to receive a mixed grade (three stars) when I review it. The concept is great, the depressing themes are great, and even the idea of a World of Darkness theme part ignites the dark fantasy passion within me. But what gives it a three star rating is the pacing. It’s slow enough to tire my eyes out after five or six pages of reading. I don’t know what exactly to owe the pacing to, but it’s definitely a slow one and that would explain why I’ve spent so much time with this book. That and it’s 400 pages long.


***WRESTLING DIALOGUE OF THE DAY***

JERRY LAWLER: If Emma was a vegetable, she’d be a cute-cumber.
MAURO RANALLO: The world is pun-derful and I’m glad you agree, King.