MOVIE TITLE: Jackie Brown
DIRECTOR: Quentin Tarantino
YEAR: 1997
GENRE: Crime Drama
RATING: R for violence, nudity, and language
GRADE: Pass
LAX flight attendant Jackie Brown is busted by the police
for smuggling cocaine and money across the Mexican border. Facing up to five
years in prison, the only way out of doing hard time is by ratting out the gun
dealer whom the money was supposed to go to, Ordell Robbie. As a sting
operation is set up to smuggle the rest of the money out of Mexico , it
isn’t always clear who’s double-crossing who. Will Jackie take off with the
money herself? Will she stay true to the police or to Ordell? She has the
know-how and seductive nature to pull off any deal she wants. Can she do it
without getting shot or sent to jail permanently?
First and foremost, the show-stealer of this movie was
Samuel L. Jackson as he portrayed Ordell Robbie. His dialogue was delivered
naturally and believably. His swearing wasn’t forced at all. He carried himself
like the crime lord he was supposed to be. The audience will either be
intimidated or thoroughly entertained by Mr. Jackson’s antics (why not both?).
However, one of the biggest criticisms this movie got was how frequently the
N-word was used by him. To those critics, I say chill out. Quentin Tarantino
didn’t write it in the script so many times because he wanted to push a racist
agenda. In the criminal underworld, it sounds completely natural, especially
coming out of Samuel L. Jackson’s mouth at a hundred miles per hour. This is
one instance in cinema history where it’s cool to root for the villain.
Speaking of dialogue, that happens to be one of Quentin
Tarantino’s strong suits as a filmmaker and it shows in this movie. While
Samuel L. Jackson stole the show, every other cast member could be credited
with bringing a believable story to life with their dialogue alone. It could be
Pam Grier talking about getting old and starting over again. It could be
Bridget Fonda having a casual chitchat with Robert De Niro. It could be Robert
Forster talking about how much he hates his job (while still delivering his
dialogue like a true professional bondsman). Whether it’s mundane conversation
or it actually advances the story, you’ll want to keep your ears open the whole
way throughout this movie. It certainly makes up for the oftentimes slow action
sequences in between.
If I have one criticism for this movie, it’s that the
storyline mechanics were hard to piece together at times. I’m not talking about
the audience constantly guessing who Jackie Brown is going to double-cross,
that part I’m okay with. I’m talking about keeping up with how the final
transaction of Mexican money is supposed to go down. I’m talking about all the
ways it went wrong. I’m talking about the climax of the movie and why it
couldn’t have happened sooner. I understand that Quentin Tarantino loves his
complex storylines, but too much complexity can take the audience out of the
viewing experience, especially if things don’t click together by the end
credits. But this is a minor criticism at best, so don’t let it discourage you
from watching this movie.
I’ve always known that Quentin Tarantino was a master
storyteller the minute I watched Pulp Fiction. Watching his other movies, this
one included, proves his mantle over and over again. Jackie Brown didn’t feel
formulaic. It felt fresh and new despite the fact that it was released in 1997.
I hope to one day watch Mr. Tarantino’s entire collection of movies and give
them all high praise. But for tonight, Jackie Brown gets a solid four out of
five stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment